Dice on a green felt gambling table
YES” in Paris and setbacks
I mentioned last week that if his book is “if / reverse” that can play this instead of parlays. Some of you do not know how to make a bet “if / reverse.” For a full explanation and comparison of “if” Paris, “if / reverse” is, and parlays, and situations in which everyone is better ..
A “yes” bet is exactly what it sounds. A team that bet on it, and if he wins gets a sum equal to B. A team conference with two games out at different times is a kind of “if” bet where you bet on the first team, and if you win, you bet double on the second computer. With a true “if” bets, rather than twice in the second team, set an amount equal to the second team.
You can avoid two calls to the bookies and lock in the current line after a game, you tell your sportsbook you want to be an “if” bet. “If” in Paris can also be done in two games starting at the same time. The book will wait until the first game is over. If you win the first game, will be an amount equal to the second game, even if you have already played.
Even if “if” bet is actually two straight to Paris IGV normal, you can not decide later that you no longer want the second bet. Once you have an “if” bet, second bet can not be reversed, even if the second game is not out yet. If the first party wins, you have a share for the second game. For this reason there is less control over an “if” bet that more than two straight bets. When the two games to bet, bet coincidence in time, but the only way only if the other is a “yes” wins the bet. Of course, if two sets overlap in time, the cancellation of the second game until there is no problem. Note that if both sides start at different times, most books are not allowed to fill in the second game later. Appointing the two teams, if you make the bet.
You can do an “if” bet with bookmakers, said: “I want to do an” if “bet”, then: “Give me a team of a B team, if for $ 100.” Enter your bookmaker that instruction would be the same as in Paris $ 110 to $ 100 in a team victory, and only if Team A wins, the bet will win another $ 110 to $ 100 on computer B
If the first team to lose the “if” bet, no bet on the second team. If the team wins its second defeat, the total loss in the “if” bet would be $ 110 if you lose the first team. If the first team to win, but it has a stake of $ 110 to win $ 100, goes to the second team. In this case, if the second team loses, the loss of only $ 10 sales tax on the distribution of the two teams would be. If both parties win, you win $ 100 to $ 100 on Team A and Team B, with a total gain of $ 200. Therefore, the maximum loss would be a “yes” $ 110, and the maximum payout is $ 200. This is the disadvantage of losing the full $ 110, instead of just $ 10 Vig, when the teams split the first team to lose the bet against.
As you can see, it is important to put the game first in an “if” bet. If you put the first loser in a fraction, then you completely lose your bet. Yes, but the loser is the second team to participate in the bet, then you only lose the VAT.
Bettors soon discovered how to avoid the uncertainty of the order of the gains and loses has to make two “if” in Paris, first to each team. Instead of $ 110 bets on “Team A Team B if” you put $ 55 in “Team A Team B if” and then make a second “if” bet to reverse the order of the equipment for an additional $ 55 . The second bet would be the B team first and a second computer. This kind of daily double, reversing the order of these two teams, because “if / reverse” or sometimes just a “reverse”.
A “reverse” is two separate “if” in Paris:
If Team A Team B to win $ 55 to $ 50, and
Team B if Team A to win $ 55 to $ 50.
It is not necessary to specify the two Parisians. Simply enter the employee who wants a “reverse” bet, the two teams, and the crowd.
If both teams win, the result would be the same as when you played an “if” bet of $ 100. You win $ 50 on Team A in the first “if the bet, and then $ 50 on Team B, with a total gain of $ 100. In the second” if “bet, you win $ 50 on computer B, $ 50 on Team A, for a total of $ 100 to win. Both “if” in Paris resulted in a gain of $ 200, if both teams win.
If both teams lose, the result is the same as if you played a “yes” set $ 100. Team A would cost $ 55 loss in the first “if” the combination, and nothing is going to cost as a team in the second combination, the loss of team B, which would be $ 55, and nothing, Team A. loss of $ 55 in each of Paris for a total loss of up to $ 110 every time you lose the two teams.
The difference occurs when the teams split. To lose $ 110 instead of the first team to win and who loses from the second, and $ 10 if the first team wins, but lost the second in the opposite direction, you get $ 60 lost on a division, not care team that wins and who loses. It works this way. If Team A loses, you lose $ 55 in the first combination, and have nothing going on to win the team B. win in the second combination, $ 50 on Team B and Team A has an action by a loss of $ 55, with a net loss in the second combination of GST $ 5. The loss of $ 55 are on the first “if” bet $ 5 and the second “if” you bet a cumulative loss of $ 60 “back” on. If Team B loses, the combination is lost $ 5 of GST in the first and $ 55 in the second combination thereof $ 60 in the division ..
We accomplish this small loss of $ 60 instead of $ 110 when the first team to lose, not win a decrease of victory, when both teams. In both cases, the mere $ 110 “if” bet and the two vice-versa, “when” of Paris for $ 55, the benefit is $ 200, if the two teams to cover the difference. The book never had this kind of disadvantage, however. The gain of $ 50, if Team A loses, is entirely due to the additional loss of $ 50 ($ 60 instead of $ 10), if Team B the losers are compensated. Therefore, the “reverse” does not save us money, but has the advantage that the risk more predictable, and avoidance of the application, the team ranked first in the “if” bet.
(The following is a discussion of the art in Paris. If you give diagrams and explanations of a headache, jump and just write the rules. I will summarize the rules in an easy way to copy the list of my next article.)
As with parlays, the general rule “if” is Paris:
No, if you have more than 52.5% or more of their games to win. If you do not always have a winning percentage, but you can do “if” every time you bet two teams in Paris, will save you money.
Win for the climate, adding that “if” bet an element of luck in Paris equation, which is not theirs. If two games are bet, then both should be the bet. You should not bet on it subject to conditions or not, you can win another. To prevent the other side, for the climate, which has a negative expectation, put the “yes” to distinguish it from betting on the second team when the team loses the first. By preventing that Paris has been determined, but the “if” bet the weather IGV slightly negative expectation.
Savings of $ 10 for the “if” time due to the fact that Paris is the second game, if both lose. Compared to the correct time, the “if” bettor has won an additional $ 100 if Team A and Team B loses, but save $ 110, if Team A and Team B to lose both.
In short, everything that prevents the loser of the bet more games like this. “When” Paris of reducing the number of games, the loser in Paris.
The rule to gain time is exactly the opposite. All that is the climate in order to win more games in Paris bad, and therefore, “if” winning is going to cost money Paris maintains handicap. If time has fewer wins, has fewer winners. Remember that next time someone tells you how to win is to bet fewer games. A smart winner not want to bet fewer games. Because “if / reverse” exactly the same as “if” in Paris, they decide to put the winner in the same disadvantage.
Exceptions to the rule – if you have to be a winner and bet parlays “if” as with every rule there are exceptions. “When” Parlays and Paris should be a winner with a positive expectation in only two cases ::
If no choice but to abandon either one. “Yes / reverse” a parlay or a teaser or co-dependent of the proposed Paris The only time you think you may have no choice, if you’re the best man of his friend, waiting at the altar, Portable Air ridiculous in my pocket, so its demand in the car left, which does not have to bet on the lake, have a checking account without a credit line, book a minimum bet of $ 50 phone, how two parties coincide in time, pull out your cell loyal to 5 minutes before kickoff and 45 seconds before the altar with a good woman to walk in a bestial purple dress with ruffles on the arm, try two to Paris $ 55 and suddenly realize you only have $ 75 in your account.
As the old philosopher said, “Is that what worries you, Bucky?” If this happens, keep in your head, put a smile on your face, look for the silver lining on the horizon, and establish a $ 50 “if” your bet on both teams. Of course, you can create a parlay, but as discussed below, the “. If / reverse” is a good substitute for the combo, if you won
The winner is the best linear method Paris. In the case of co-dependency in Paris, however, as already mentioned, there is a great advantage for the combination of Paris. With a combo of the weather gets the advantage of increased parlay odds 13-5 in Paris along with a larger than normal expectation of winning. Should always be included in the same game since by definition of the co-dependent, in Paris, you have to, because “if” in Paris. With the use of co-dependence of our advantage is that we are the second bet that if you make suggestions.
We would be wise to bet $ 110 per right on the favorite and the underdog and $ 110 depending on the top and bottom. Only lose the VAT, no matter how often or more preferred combinations and the oppressed and won. As we have seen, if we are to play two of the four possible outcomes in the two parlays of the favorites and underdogs, and above and below, we can make a profit of $ 160 when one of our combinations in. When choosing a parlay or “backward” when co-dependent combinations are discussed below.
Select the base between the “yes” and a $ 110 parlays Paris Combo, which will be used for comparison constant, our net combo, when one of our favorite combinations is $ 176 ($ 286 parlay the victory income of least $ 110 loss in losing parlay). $ 110 in a “reverse” bet our victory would net $ 180 each time one of our favorite combinations (win $ 400, if the gain / contrast, less the $ 220 loss on the losing side, if / back).
If separation occurs and the title comes with the favorite, or just above the oppressed, the combined loss of $ 110, while the opposite will lose $ 120. For example, the “reverse” a profit of $ 4 on the winning side, and the Parlay has an advantage of $ 10 on the losing side. Obviously, again, it would be better in the parlay 50-50.
With the co-dependent side and total bets, but we are not in a position 50-50. If the favorite covers the spread is high, it is more likely that the game goes to the relatively small sum, and if the favorite does not meet the high prevalence is likely to play in the total. As we have seen, if you have a positive expectation “if / reverse” is a big bet parlay. The actual probability of a victory on our side and co-dependent number of operations depends on the proximity of the site and a total of one another, but co-dependent gives a positive expectation.
The point that “if / reverse” is a better option than the combination of both of our co-dependency, a profit rate of 72%. No victory is so outrageous it may sound rate. In both combinations, you have two chances to win. Just win one of the two. Each combination has a positive expectation of independence. If we assume that coincidence is the favorite or the underdog will win (win, of course, one way or another must) to 100%, then you need only a probability of 72% if, for example, Boston College – 38 ½ results enough to win by 39 points the game will be over 53 in a total of at least ½ to 72% of the time, as a commitment to co-dependency. If Ball State also scored a touchdown, then we are only half a point away from victory. C is in British Columbia is reporting lead in more than 72% of the time there is a reasonable assumption, given the circumstances.
Compared with a combo, a rate of 72% profit, our two “if / reverse” Paris wins an additional $ 4 72 for the win total increased by 4 million x 72 = $ 288. Bet “if / reverse” is to miss an additional $ 10 to 28 times the results distributed to a total loss of $ 280. Obviously, a gain of 72% of the difference is small.
Rule. “Yes / back” to win percentages below 72% use of combinations to win, and 72% or higher, with